Thursday, October 13, 2011
Propers Plus for October 16
Thursday, October 06, 2011
Presentation on Isaiah 25:6–9, Old Testament Lesson for Sunday, October 9, 2011
Click for view of a the presentation
Some notes from The Lutheran Study Bible, Concordia Self-Study Commentary, Concordia Self-Study Bible. Texts generally from ESV.
Propers Plus for October 9, 2011
Friday, July 15, 2011
NIV2011
Wednesday, May 04, 2011
"Paradigm-Collapse Trauma" and the end of Biblical Minimalism.
What about the NIV 2011 edition?
Wednesday, April 06, 2011
A Multi-Faith Reality
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Religion May Become Extinct In Nine Nations!
This BBC headline is shocking! What is even more shocking is the list of nations that are becoming irreligious: Australia, Austria, Canada, the Czech Republic, Finland, Ireland, the Netherlands, New Zealand and Switzerland. You can see from this list that these are all historically Christian nations. Three are English speaking countries. Some are historically Catholic; some are historically Reformed; and one is historically Lutheran. You can read the article at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12811197
How can this be happening? What are the causes? How can the religion of the martyrs waste away to extinction???
How can those who once sang: The Word they still shall let remain Nor any thanks have for it; He’s by our side upon the plain With His good gifts and Spirit. And take they our life, Goods, fame, child, and wife, Though these all be gone, Our vict’ry has been won; The Kingdom ours remaineth, abandon the faith?
The decline of Christianity in these nations did not happen overnight. It began with complacency. It began when people took their Christian heritage for granted. It began when parents and grandparents thought little of passing the faith on to their children.
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
So What's wrong with Rob Bell and his new book?
God Is Still Holy and What You Learned in Sunday School Is Still True: A Review of “Love Wins”
As a communicator, Rob Bell is a genius. He is the master of the pungent question, the turn-the-picture-upside-down story, and the personal anecdote. Like Harry Emerson Fosdick, the paladin of pulpit liberalism, Rob Bell is a master communicator. Had he set out to defend the biblical doctrine of hell, he could have done so marvelously. He would have done the church a great service. But that is not what he set out to do.
Like Fosdick, Rob Bell cares deeply for people. It comes through in his writings. There is no reason to doubt that Bell wrote this book out of his own personal concern for people who are put off by the doctrine of hell. Had that concern been turned toward a presentation of how the biblical doctrine of hell fits within the larger context of God’s love and justice and the Gospel of Jesus Christ, that would have been a help to untold thousands of Christians and others seeking to understand the Christian faith. But that is not what Bell does in this new book.
Instead, Rob Bell uses his incredible power of literary skill and communication to unravel the Bible’s message and to cast doubt on its teachings."
Thursday, February 10, 2011
Commentary on Schwan's Propositions on Unevangelical Practice - 1862 (3 & 4)
3. For this very reason, when we follow evangelical practice, we do not discard the Law or make its edges dull through bringing in the Gospel, but we rather preach it with all the more seriousness in its full severity, however, in evangelical fashion.
4. The Law is used in an evangelical way if it is employed solely for the purpose of preparing the soil for the evangelical message (the Gospel) and of submitting a divine norm for the manifestations of the new life that spontaneously arises through the evangelical message.
Relying on the Gospel does not mean that we reject the law. In fact it means that we preach it with earnestness. The Gospel lesson ( Matthew 5:21–37) for this week is a prime example. In his Preface to his Commentary on the Sermon on the Mount, Luther points out that his opponents say, “Christian teaching would have much too hard a time of it if it were loaded down with things like this.” But we understand that Jesus meant exactly what He said in His Sermon on the Mount, “But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire."
We along with the Pharisees must come to understand that the mountain of keeping the Law is too great even for those who have the best intentions. We must rely solely and completely on the work of Christ for Salvation. The only solution to the deadliness of Sin is faith in Christ. Without a full and complete proclamation of the Law, we will always be tempted to also avoid the foolishness of the cross.
However When we believe and trust in the sweet message of forgiveness, life and salvation through faith in Christ, we are more than willing to live the new life that has been born anew in us by the working of the Holy Spirit through Word and Sacraments.
Schwan's Propositions on Unevangelical Practice - 1862
Wednesday, February 09, 2011
Commentary on Schwan's Propositions on Unevangelical Practice - 1862 (#2)
Sunday, February 06, 2011
Commentary on Schwan's Propositions on Unevangelical Practice - 1862
Thursday, February 03, 2011
Our greatest battles are not against culture per se
Friday, January 21, 2011
Easier, Cheaper and Faster
Thursday, December 16, 2010
How December 25 Became Christmas
Saturday, October 16, 2010
A Reformation Story from Paul McCain
Fifteen Minutes That Changed the World Forever: Reflections on the Reformation
I'm asked for a copy of this article every year, and so am happy again to provide it. Please feel free to copy and share it, but I would ask that it not be changed. Thanks.Fifteen Minutes that Changed the World ForeverBy Rev. Paul T. McCain
Several years ago, I attended a conference on the doctrine of justification in Wittenberg, Germany. There were pastors, presidents and bishops from Lutheran churches throughout Europe, Scandinavia, the Baltics, Eastern and Central Europe, Africa, and various countries in the land of the former Soviet Union. These servants of Christ know what it means to be distinctly Lutheran, often under extremely difficult and challenging circumstances. In many cases, they are walking through fiery trials suffering various forms of persecution for their commitment to Christ and His Word. It was humbling to be with them and discuss the chief article of the faith.
It was also quite a thrill to spend four days in Wittenberg and walk where Luther walked. On the last day of the conference I decided to time how long it would have taken Martin Luther to walk from the door of his Augustinian monastery to the Castle Church to post the ninety-five theses. Another LCMS pastor attending the conference, Bob Zagore, came with me and he counted the steps. Bob counted 2,000 steps. I counted fifteen minutes.
As Luther left his monastery on October 31, 1517, turned left, and walked to the Castle Church on the west side of town, I doubt he had any idea just what he was setting motion. Four years later, Pope Leo’s representative, Aleander reported, “All of Germany is an uproar! Ninety-percent of the people are shouting, “Luther!” and the other ten percent—if they don’t care about Luther—at least have “Death to the Roman court!” as their slogan.” (Martin Brecht, Martin Luther The Road to Reformation, Fortress Press: 1:439).
Father Martin, parish pastor, was outraged by the Roman system of indulgences and what it was doing to the precious souls he cared for at the city church of St. Mary as confessor and preacher. He was deeply angered when one after another member of his congregation told him about the indulgence that they had walked all day to buy from John Tetzel in the little town of Jütebog, just over the border of Electoral Saxony. They thought they had assurance of grace and comfort, for themselves, or for loved ones who had died. They clung to their indulgence receipt, instead of the crucified Lord. They believed that with their act of penance and contribution to the construction of St. Peter’s in Rome, God would smile on them and make things easier for them after their death.
Luther could not remain silent. And so he spoke, and wrote, and preached, and taught, and debated. He posted his theses and he mailed a copy of them on the same day to the Archbishop of Mainz, protesting the indulgences that were being sold within his diocese. In so doing, Luther set an axe at the root of the Papal tree. Enormous sources of revenue were at stake. Papal and imperial politics were involved beyond what Luther fully realized. Luther said after the controversy was under way:
Thursday, October 14, 2010
America’s Four Gods
From Cranach: The Blog of Veith
By Gene Edward Veith.
Veith is the Provost and Professor of Literature at Patrick Henry College, the Director of the Cranach Institute at Concordia Theological Seminary, a columnist for World Magazine and TableTalk, and the author of 18 books on different facets of Christianity & Culture.
Baylor sociologists Paul Froese and Christopher Bader have conducted research into people’s conception of God. They published their findings in a new book America’s Four Gods: What We Say About God — And What That Says About Us. They found that Americans have four different assumptions about what God is like. They also found correlations between the kind of God someone believes in and their political and moral beliefs. Here are America’s four Gods:
•The Authoritative God. When conservatives Sarah Palin or Glenn Beck proclaim that America will lose God’s favor unless we get right with him, they’re rallying believers in what Froese and Bader call an Authoritative God, one engaged in history and meting out harsh punishment to those who do not follow him. About 28% of the nation shares this view, according to Baylor’s 2008 findings.
“They divide the world by good and evil and appeal to people who are worried, concerned and scared,” Froese says. “They respond to a powerful God guiding this country, and if we don’t explicitly talk about (that) God, then we have the wrong God or no God at all.”
•The Benevolent God. When President Obama says he is driven to live out his Christian faith in public service, or political satirist Stephen Colbert mentions God while testifying to Congress in favor of changing immigration laws, they’re speaking of what the Baylor researchers call a Benevolent God. This God is engaged in our world and loves and supports us in caring for others, a vision shared by 22% of Americans, according to Baylor’s findings.
“Rhetoric that talks about the righteous vs. the heathen doesn’t appeal to them,” Froese says. “Their God is a force for good who cares for all people, weeps at all conflicts and will comfort all.”
Asked about the Baylor findings, Philip Yancey, author of What Good Is God?, says he moved from the Authoritative God of his youth — “a scowling, super-policeman in the sky, waiting to smash someone having a good time” — to a “God like a doctor who has my best interest at heart, even if sometimes I don’t like his diagnosis or prescriptions.”
•The Critical God. The poor, the suffering and the exploited in this world often believe in a Critical God who keeps an eye on this world but delivers justice in the next, Bader says.
Bader says this view of God — held by 21% of Americans — was reflected in a sermon at a working-class neighborhood church the researchers visited in Rifle, Colo., in 2008. Pastor Del Whittington’s theme at Open Door Church was ” ‘Wait until heaven, and accounts will be settled.’ “
Bader says Whittington described how ” ‘our cars that are breaking down here will be chariots in heaven. Our empty bank accounts will be storehouses with the Lord.’ “
•The Distant God. Though about 5% of Americans are atheists or agnostics, Baylor found that nearly one in four (24%) see a Distant God that booted up the universe, then left humanity alone.
via Americans’ views of God shape attitudes on key issues – USATODAY.com.
Isn’t it true that none of these, in isolation, is anything like the Christian God? Surely Christians believe that God has ALL of these qualities. Christians believe that God is a Trinity, that He is complex and a mystery. (And if natural laws, such as we are seeing with quantum physics are complex and mysterious, shouldn’t God be far more so? And yet people insist on these simplistic, anthropomorphic, unitarian deities.) While each of these deities can be adapted into an ecumenical paradigm in which all religions “have the same God,” the Christian God is completely different from these four, each of which is some variation of a transcendent deity looking down on the creation. Notice that there is no category for God Incarnate.
No wonder churches are so weak and Christians’ faith is so anemic, if they don’t have the right God.
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Every Attempt to Create an Ideal Church Results in a Church of Pharisees
"Ubi Christus, ibi ecclesia, "Where Christ is, there is the church". With this saying one of the oldest church fathers spoke of the mystery of the church. The saying also sums up Luther's faith* in the church. It is not the power of our faith, nor the holiness of our life that constitutes the church, but rather that "Where Christ is, there is the church". When the church is called a holy people, a communion of saints, it is not to be understood in the way it has often been understood in the history of the church: "the church should be a holy people, therefore only the holy shall belong to her. Away with all the unholy! The honour of Christ demands it!" When the worst of sinners must be excluded from the fellowship, one must then begin to classify sins in order to determine which ones lead to exclusion. How often has not that been attempted, both in the past and more recently. How imposing was the strictness of the ancient church, when people sought to create a holy and pure church (as also happens now). Or consider the Donatists, who demanded that at least the clergy should be free of mortal sin. Whenever the attempt has been made to create an ideal church, the end result has always been bitter disappointment. The community of saints turns into a community of Pharisees."
— Hermann Sasse
*"Faith" in the sense that the church is an article of faith; see the Augsburg Confession, Articles VII & VIII - M.H.
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Thought for the Day.
"Seeing that Paul set this forth with the greatest care, we must unremittingly labor to show clearly the difference between law and gospel. This is very easy so far as the words themselves are concerned. For who does not see that Hagar is not Sarah and that Sarah is not Hagar (Gal 4:21-31)? Or that Ishmael neither is nor has what Isaac is and has? That is easily determined. But in profound terrors and in the agony of death, when the conscience struggles with the judgment of God, then to be able to say with firm confidence: 'I am not a son of Hagar, but of Sarah, that is, the law does not apply to me at all, because Sarah is my mother, who gives birth, not to slaves but to free children and heirs'--this is the most difficult thing of all."
Martin Luther, Commentary on Galatians, loc. cit.
From Scott Murray's Memorial Moments for today.
Friday, June 04, 2010
Sad News from Finland
Saturday, April 24, 2010
Nominations for president of the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod
It's a report on the nominations for President of Lutheran Church--Missouri Synod. It's always interesting to note what the secular press has to say about things.
Nominations for President of the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod